The Bottom Line in Education: Unravelling the Economics of For-Profit Schools

We have been addressing the relationship between politics and economics from the standpoint of political economy for a while now. The underlying argument that investing in human capital is vital but inadequate to turn education into a force for societal advancement and human flourishing is supported by this contextual approach to the link between economics and education.

What transpires, though, when for-profit organisations get involved? The intricate matter of “The Bottom Line in Education: Unravelling the Economics of For-Profit Schools” is explored in depth in this detailed interview today.

We have Pratik Mukhopadhyay, CFO at Fortes Education, with us. Pratik enhances Fortes' operations with rigorous financial discipline, risk control procedures, and an exceptional workflow. With over 23 years of experience in various industries, Pratik holds the CGMA credential and is also a Fellow Member of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, UK.

Mr. Pratik,

Welcome to Business Lobbies!

We appreciate your effort and the time you have taken for this interview. In today’s discussion, we will break down all the factors influencing schools and have a look at how commercial interests and academic objectives can collide. We'll also discuss the possible advantages and disadvantages while challenging the notion that for-profit educational institutions can provide high-quality education.

I’ll begin with the questions now.

 

Q1. Could you elaborate on how you managed to balance academic objectives and the possible demands of a for-profit institution?

Mr. Pratik - The reputation and sustainability of an educational institution hinge on effectively balancing profitability with the delivery of outstanding education. Striking this balance is indeed challenging, but success lies in a multi-faceted approach that includes:

1. Quality Education: Delivering high-quality, value-based education has consistently been our top priority, ensuring that our institution maintains a strong brand reputation. By adopting a student-centric approach that nurtures the hearts and minds of our young learners, we empower them to flourish and achieve their aspirations. Significant investments in teacher training, curriculum development, and modern technology reinforce our commitment to excellence. This holistic strategy aligns our academic and financial goals and enhances our ability to attract and retain students, thereby supporting the institution’s long-term economic stability.

2. Corporate Partnerships: We actively collaborate with industry partners to provide our students with practical experience and early exposure to the professional world, facilitating a smooth transition to successful careers. These partnerships also strengthen our institution’s relevance and appeal, contributing to both educational and financial success.

3. Efficient Resource Management: Through the implementation of efficient resource management practices, we have optimised costs while maintaining high educational standards. This allows us to deliver quality education without compromising financial sustainability.

4. Diversified Revenue Streams: We have strategically developed additional revenue streams, such as renting out our facilities during non-school hours and reducing our reliance on tuition fees alone. This diversification bolsters our financial resilience and allows continued investment in academic excellence.

5. Ethical Practices: Upholding ethical practices is central to our long-term sustainability and the trust we build with students, faculty and investors. We maintain transparency in how funds are allocated to enhance educational outcomes, ensuring that profit motives never overshadow our commitment to academic integrity.

By continuously evaluating and adapting these strategies, we effectively balance our academic objectives with the demands of a for-profit institution, ensuring that both educational excellence and financial viability are achieved.

 

Q2. Have you observed any unforeseen trends in the way traditional schools and for-profit schools operate financially?

Mr. Pratik - Several unexpected trends have surfaced in the financial operations of both traditional and for-profit schools:

1. Rising Cost Pressures: Both traditional and for-profit schools are grappling with increasing costs, particularly in areas such as energy, staff wages, regulatory compliance and maintenance. Global events like the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing geopolitical tensions have exacerbated these pressures, leading to higher operational expenses and more significant financial uncertainty.

2. Declining Enrolments: Traditional schools, in particular, are witnessing a decline in enrolments, which threatens their financial stability. This trend is driven by demographic shifts and increased competition from other educational providers that offer superior facilities and resources, attracting students away from established institutions.

3. Transition to Online Education: A significant trend post-pandemic has been the accelerated shift to online education, which has heightened reliance on technology and digital learning platforms. While this shift has required substantial initial investments, it has also resulted in long-term savings and efficiencies. Traditional schools often have more rigid financial frameworks, whereas for-profit schools are generally more agile, quickly adapting to market demands and economic fluctuations. Additionally, the growing focus on extracurricular programs and holistic education, which require extra funding, also helps attract a broader student base.

For instance, stricter regulations on tuition fee increases or changes in government funding can significantly challenge the economic viability of traditional legacy schools.

These trends highlight the critical need for adaptability and proactive financial management. Our institution's proactive response to these trends should reassure you about our adaptability and commitment to the long-term sustainability of both traditional and for-profit educational institutions.

 

Q3. Could you provide a personal account or anecdote that best illustrates the conflict you have seen in the education sector between aspirations for education and budgetary constraints?

Mr. Pratik - A personal account that illustrates the conflict between educational aspirations and budgetary constraints that occurred during the planning of a new programme at one of our schools. We had identified a significant need to introduce an advanced STEAM and Design Thinking curriculum that would better prepare our students for future careers in science, technology and business. The academic team was passionate about the project, envisioning state-of-the-art labs, specialised teacher training, and a comprehensive curriculum overhaul. The potential benefits for our students were immense, and the programme aligned perfectly with our mission to provide top-notch education.

However, when we began reviewing the financial implications, the reality of our budgetary constraints became apparent. The costs associated with implementing this programme, i.e., equipment, infrastructure, faculty training, and ongoing operational expenses, far exceeded our available budget. We faced a difficult choice between scaling back the programme significantly or diverting funds from other critical areas.

After extensive deliberation, we decided to proceed with a phased approach. Instead of launching the complete programme immediately, we started with a pilot that utilised existing resources and focused on enhancing teacher capabilities first. Although this meant compromising on our initial aspirations, it allowed us to move forward without jeopardising the school’s financial health. Over time, as the pilot proved successful and generated positive outcomes, we gradually expanded the programme, securing additional funding.

This experience highlighted the ongoing tension between our desire to push the boundaries of educational excellence and the financial realities we must navigate. It reinforced the importance of strategic planning, creative problem-solving and the willingness to make difficult decisions to balance our aspirations with fiscal responsibility.

 

Q4. What are the primary challenges to maintaining a sound balance between the financial viability of for-profit schools and the quality of education they provide?

Mr. Pratik - Balancing the financial viability of for-profit schools with the quality of education they deliver involves several key challenges:

1. Resource Allocation: A significant challenge is allocating financial resources effectively. This entails prioritising spending on areas that directly impact student learning and outcomes, such as hiring qualified teachers, supporting their ongoing professional development, investing in modern educational technologies and maintaining up-to-date facilities. Balancing these educational needs with the requirement to generate profit demands careful strategic planning and decision-making.

2. Tuition Fees: For-profit schools have to set tuition fees at a level that secures financial sustainability while remaining accessible to a diverse student body. High fees can limit access for many families, potentially reducing diversity within the student population. Achieving a balance between affordability and financial viability is crucial to maintaining both inclusivity and educational quality.

3. Quality Assurance: Another challenge is ensuring consistent quality across all aspects of the educational experience. This includes upholding high academic standards, offering comprehensive extracurricular programs, and prioritising student well-being. For-profit schools must regularly monitor and evaluate their offerings to ensure they meet the highest standards, a resource-intensive process.

4. Market Competition: The education sector is highly competitive, with numerous schools competing for students. For-profit schools often differentiate themselves by offering unique programs, superior facilities and innovative teaching methods, which require substantial investment. Balancing these investments with the need to remain financially viable is essential.

5. Regulatory Compliance: For-profit schools must navigate a complex landscape of regulations and standards set by educational authorities. Compliance is vital for maintaining accreditation and reputation but can be both costly and time-consuming. Balancing regulatory demands with financial constraints remains an ongoing challenge.

6. Stakeholder Expectations: It is critical to manage the varied expectations of different stakeholders, such as parents, students, staff, and investors. Each group has distinct priorities, and for-profit schools must address these while also meeting their financial objectives. Transparent communication and effective stakeholder engagement are essential for achieving this balance.

7. Long-term Sustainability: Ensuring long-term financial sustainability while continually improving educational quality requires a forward-thinking approach. This involves investing in areas such as ongoing teacher development, curriculum innovation and infrastructure upgrades, even though these investments may yield little financial returns.

8. Ethical Consideration: Balancing the profit motive with ethical considerations in education can be challenging. Schools must ensure that their financial strategies do not compromise their educational mission.

Addressing these challenges necessitates strategic foresight, transparent communication and a firm commitment to maintaining high educational standards alongside financial sustainability.

 

Q5. Which innovative ideas or strategies do you think will eventually close the gap between educational excellence and commercial feasibility?

Mr. Pratik - Bridging the gap between educational excellence and commercial viability necessitates innovative approaches to enhance quality and financial sustainability. The following strategies are crucial in achieving this balance:

1. Blended Learning Models: Integrating online and in-person instruction can help reduce costs while upholding high educational standards. Blended learning enables schools to optimise classroom space, offer flexible learning environments and leverage digital resources to boost student engagement and outcomes. This approach can also broaden the school’s reach.

2. Adaptive Learning Technologies: Employing artificial intelligence, machine learning and virtual reality for immersive learning experiences can enhance both student outcomes and operational efficiency. These technologies can personalise content to meet individual student needs, thereby improving engagement and retention.

3. Sustainable Practices: Adopting eco-friendly initiatives and sustainable practices can lead to long-term cost savings. These include implementing green building designs with solar panels, energy-efficient lighting, water-saving technologies, waste reduction programs, and sustainable resource management.

4. Scholarship Programs: Offering scholarships can attract talented students and boost the school’s reputation, leading to increased enrolment and financial stability.

5. Innovative Curriculum Design: Developing a curriculum that incorporates real-world skills and interdisciplinary learning can attract more students and better prepare them for future careers. Schools can differentiate themselves in a competitive market by offering specialised programs in areas such as STEAM, fine arts and entrepreneurship, which can justify higher tuition fees.

6. Enrichment Programs: Providing diverse extracurricular and enrichment programs can enhance the overall educational experience and appeal to families seeking holistic development opportunities for their children. These programs can also create additional revenue streams through fees.

7. Professional Development for Teachers: Investing in continuous professional development ensures that teachers stay updated with the latest pedagogical skills and knowledge. Well-trained teachers can deliver high-quality education, which improves student outcomes and bolsters the school’s reputation, thereby attracting more enrolments.

8. Community Engagement: Building strong relationships with the local community can increase support and funding. Schools can host events, workshops, and volunteer programs that engage parents and alumni and foster a supportive network.

9. Data-Driven Decision Making: Using data analytics to guide strategic decisions can optimise resource allocation and enhance educational outcomes. This includes monitoring student performance, financial metrics and operational efficiency.

10. Alumni Networks: Establishing robust alumni networks can provide ongoing support for the school. Alumni can contribute through mentorship programs and promote the school within their professional and social circles, thereby enhancing its reputation.

11. Alternate Funding Models: Exploring alternative funding options, such as income-share agreements, where students pay a pre-agreed percentage of their future income during the first five years of their careers, can make education more accessible and financially sustainable.

By adopting these innovative strategies, schools can create a sustainable model that balances educational excellence with commercial viability, ensuring the continued provision of high-quality education while remaining financially sound.

 

With this, we come to the end of this valuable interview. We thank Mr. Pratik Mukhopadhyay for sharing his constructive thoughts on the topic of “The Bottom Line in Education: Unravelling the Economics of For-Profit Schools”. We wish him all the very best for all his future endeavours and hope he continues to illuminate the paths of the finance and educational spheres.

 

Stay tuned on our platform Business Lobbies for more such exclusive interviews, Op-Eds and special feature articles, on all things business.